Qualified sponsorship payments. A qualified sponsorship payment is any payment for which there is no agreement or expectation that the payer will receive a substantial refund that is not the use or confirmation of the payer`s name or logo. A “substantial benefit of reimbursement” (which could lead to the imposition of payments for the organization) is more than “negligible” goods, services or other benefits and may include advertising. The question of what is the essential utility can create some confusion problems. According to the rule, if a sponsor receives something in return for his donation, he must have a value of 2% or less of the sponsorship payment. If its market value was greater than 2%, the total value of the yield advantage would be subject to UBIT. In the end, an exemption from the Independent Business Tax (UBIT) for donations considered a corporate sponsorship. Income-producing activities for exempt organizations, such as a business or business, that are carried out on a regular basis; and have nothing to do with their exempt uses, UBIT is subject to UBIT. Under the rules, this banner would not tax sporting goods activity and be considered a “corporate sponsorship.” Art. 513 (i). In order to reduce the uncertainty surrounding the tax treatment of corporate sponsorship payments, Congress considered it appropriate to distinguish sponsorship payments for which the donor has no significant benefit, with the exception of the use or recognition of the donor`s name or logo in a sponsored event (which should not be subject to tax) from payments made in exchange for advertising of the organization (which should be taxed). That is why, in 1997, Congress passed Section 513 (i) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that any amount considered a “qualified sponsorship payment” is not tax-subject independent business income. In order to refine and explain the details of this provision, the IRS adopted proposed regulations in March 2000.

For all external sponsors, a “third-party contract” is maintained in the system. While internal sponsorships are maintained by internal contracts. Accounting positions generated by internal contracts are very different from external contracts. In early 2014, the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee released a draft containing several proposed changes to the tax code. This project contains specific revisions to the treatment of sponsorship for UBIT purposes. On the basis of the proposal, if an organization were to use the name or logo of a sponsor`s production line, the sponsor`s donation would be considered an unrelated serze or business income. Because services are required under the sponsorship contract, the fair value of $500 of the training received is considered uns tied business income. Many non-profit organizations receive donations from companies that want to support their efforts. These “corporate sponsorships” have been questioned by the IRS as to whether or not they would be subject to certain taxes. The IRS issued rules on corporate sponsorships in 2002 through several judgments in court proceedings. The essence of these cases is whether donations are considered “corporate sponsorships,” which are excluded from the income of unrelated businesses, or as advertisements that would be subject to an independent business tax.

The IRS would consider advertising to be a “significant performance benefit.” Background. When the IRS first addressed this issue, the amounts collected by exempt organizations for these events and activities were not related to the exempt functions of organizations and were therefore taxable to organizations. Following criticism, the service re-examined the area and proposed plans that generally treated corporate sponsorships as tax-free. However, UBIT exclusions exist as “corporate sponsorships” and contain guidelines for activations and/or actions that are not taxed. In the final judgments, six elements of the company`s sponsorship were mentioned, which were not